Motion-Preserving Options
Alternatives to fusion that maintain spinal flexibility
For decades, spinal fusion was the only option for many spine conditions. Today, motion-preserving techniques allow surgeons to decompress nerves and stabilize the spine while maintaining natural movement. Dr. Greenberg's fellowship training emphasized these advanced techniques, making him one of the few surgeons in Fort Wayne offering comprehensive motion-preservation options.
Why Motion Preservation Matters
Your spine is designed to move. Each vertebra articulates with the ones above and below, creating a flexible column that allows you to bend, twist, and turn. When one level is fused, adjacent levels must compensate by moving more, potentially accelerating degeneration.
Benefits of Preserving Motion
- Maintains natural biomechanics: Spine moves as it was designed to
- Reduces adjacent segment stress: Less strain on neighboring levels
- Preserves flexibility: Better range of motion for daily activities
- May reduce future surgery risk: Less adjacent segment degeneration
- Faster return to activity: No fusion healing time required
When Fusion Is Still Necessary
Motion preservation isn't appropriate for everyone. Fusion remains the best option when:
- Significant instability or spondylolisthesis is present
- Severe arthritis has destroyed the joints
- Deformity correction is needed
- Multiple levels require treatment
- Prior surgery has altered anatomy
Learn More: Read about Dr. Greenberg's motion-preserving philosophy.
Cervical Disc Replacement (Artificial Disc)
Purpose: Replace a damaged cervical disc with an artificial disc that maintains motion, treating arm pain and myelopathy while preserving neck flexibility.
How It Works
Cervical disc replacement (also called cervical arthroplasty or ADR) involves:
- Removing the damaged disc through an anterior (front of neck) approach
- Decompressing the spinal cord and nerve roots
- Inserting an artificial disc designed to mimic natural motion
- Allowing immediate neck movement without fusion restrictions
Disc Replacement vs. ACDF
ACDF (Fusion)
- • Eliminates motion at treated level
- • Requires bone graft and plate
- • 3-6 months for fusion to heal
- • Collar often required
- • Higher adjacent segment disease risk
- • Proven long-term track record
Disc Replacement
- • Maintains motion at treated level
- • No bone graft needed
- • Faster return to activity
- • Usually no collar required
- • Lower adjacent segment disease risk
- • 20+ years of clinical data
Who Is a Candidate?
Ideal candidates for cervical disc replacement:
- Single or two-level cervical disc disease
- Arm pain or myelopathy from disc herniation or stenosis
- Preserved disc height and minimal arthritis
- No significant instability or deformity
- Age typically under 60-65 (though not absolute)
- No prior cervical fusion at adjacent levels
Recovery and Outcomes
- Hospital stay: Overnight or 23-hour observation
- Return to desk work: 2-3 weeks
- Return to full activity: 6-8 weeks
- Success rate: 85-90% experience significant symptom relief
- Motion preservation: Most patients maintain 70-80% of normal motion
- Adjacent segment disease: Significantly lower risk than fusion
Learn More: Read the complete cervical disc replacement guide and compare it to ACDF.
Cervical Foraminotomy
Purpose: Enlarge the neural foramen (nerve opening) to relieve arm pain from a pinched nerve, without removing the disc or fusing the spine.
The Procedure
Cervical foraminotomy is performed through a posterior (back of neck) approach:
- Small incision at the back of the neck
- Minimally invasive tubular approach between muscles
- Remove small amount of bone and ligament compressing the nerve
- Preserve disc, facet joints, and spinal stability
- No fusion or hardware required
Advantages
- Preserves motion: No fusion means full neck flexibility
- Preserves disc: Disc remains intact and functional
- Minimal tissue disruption: Small incision, muscle-sparing approach
- Fast recovery: Most patients home same day
- No hardware: Nothing implanted, nothing to fail
Best Candidates
Foraminotomy works best for:
- Foraminal stenosis (bone spurs narrowing nerve opening)
- Lateral disc herniations (off to the side)
- Single nerve root compression
- No central canal stenosis or myelopathy
- Preserved disc height
Learn More: Explore the detailed cervical foraminotomy guide.
Endoscopic Motion-Preserving Procedures
Endoscopic spine surgery represents the cutting edge of motion preservation. Using a thin endoscope (camera), surgeons can decompress nerves through incisions as small as 0.5 inches while preserving all structural elements.
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
For lumbar disc herniations:
- Removes herniated disc fragment through tiny incision
- Preserves facet joints and ligaments
- Maintains spinal stability and motion
- Often performed with local anesthesia and sedation
- Same-day discharge, rapid return to activity
Endoscopic Cervical Decompression
For cervical radiculopathy:
- Posterior approach preserves anterior structures
- No disc removal or fusion required
- Maintains full neck motion
- Minimal post-operative restrictions
Dr. Greenberg's Endoscopic Training
Dr. Greenberg completed advanced fellowship training in endoscopic spine surgery, learning from pioneers in the field. This specialized training allows him to offer these advanced techniques to appropriate candidates in Fort Wayne.
Learn More: Read about endoscopic spine surgery and endoscopic discectomy.
Key Takeaways
- Motion preservation maintains natural spine biomechanics and may reduce adjacent segment degeneration.
- Cervical disc replacement offers an alternative to fusion for appropriate candidates, with excellent outcomes and lower adjacent segment disease risk.
- Foraminotomy can relieve arm pain without removing the disc or fusing the spine.
- Endoscopic techniques represent the most minimally invasive motion-preserving options available.
- Not everyone is a candidate—fusion remains the best option when instability, severe arthritis, or deformity is present.
Medical Disclaimer: This chapter provides educational information only and is not intended as personal medical advice. Every patient's condition is unique. Consult with Dr. Greenberg or another qualified spine specialist for an accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment plan.